Skip to main content

When The Number Doesn't Support Donald Trump When He Said He Would Win Independents and New York state

The defining characteristic of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign is complete confidence in his correctness, regardless of the evidence at hand. Asked how he’ll achieve something seemingly (or demonstrably) impossible, and the answer, frequently, is something like, “by doing it.” It makes rebutting him simultaneously endless and fruitless, to the point that The Washington Post Fact Checker icon should transition from Pinocchio to ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.

And so, during Wednesday night’s town hall event on MSNBC, Trump waved away any questions that he wouldn’t win the general election.

Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally in Greenville, S.C. on Monday Feb. 15, 2016. (Photo by Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)

“I will have more crossover votes — if I get the nomination, I will have more crossover votes than anybody that’s ever run for office,” Trump said. “I will have Democrat votes. I will have independent votes. I will do tremendously with crossover. One other thing: I will have states that nobody ever thought of getting in terms of a Republican.”

Joe Scarborough, co-hosting the event, pressed him on that contention. “Name one.”

“New York,” Trump replied. “I think I have a great chance of Michigan. States that are not in your six states that we always talk about ... I’ll definitely get Pennsylvania. I’ll get Ohio. I think I’m going to win Florida. You see how I’m doing in Florida. I’ll get states like a Michigan and New York.”



First of all, it seems pretty unlikely that Trump will have “more crossover votes than anybody that’s ever run for office.” Plenty of partisans have handily beaten their opponents thanks to support from members of the opposite party. And more than one president has won a massive number of votes from political opponents, including Ronald Reagan, Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon. In 1984, Reagan got more than a quarter of Democrats to vote for him. That’s a mark Trump would be hard-pressed to beat.

Second, it’s not clear he’d actually do much better than the other Republicans running this year. The idea makes general sense: Trump is a candidate unlike most others, and there are suggestions that he has strong support from some blue-collar, white Democrats. It would mean reversing a recent pattern of strong partisanship in presidential elections, but it seems logical.

Recent polling, though, doesn’t support the idea.

Earlier this month, shortly after the Iowa caucuses, Quinnipiac University ran head-to-head polls pitting top Republicans against the two Democratic candidates. We must reiterate that these should not be considered predictive for the outcome in November, but we can use them to compare how the candidates fare against each other.

So here are the margins for the three Republican candidates against the two Democrats among all voters and among independents — a group that Trump also claims he’d dominate. (How to read it: If the red bar is above the middle line, the Republican leads with all voters. If the yellow one is below it, he trails with independents. If a yellow bar is lower than the adjacent red bar, the Republican did worse with independents in that match-up than he did overall.)


In this poll, Trump does much worse than Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz against both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders — and does worse with independents than he does with voters overall. Not evidence that independents will swarm to his cause.

Against Clinton and Sanders, Trump pulls 7 and 8 percent of Democrats, respectively — about the same as the 9 and 8 percent Rubio gets.

That’s one poll. Another, from USA Today and Suffolk University, had the Republicans doing much better across the board.


But, again, Trump does worse overall than Rubio, and his margin of support with independents against Sanders is only slightly higher than what the Florida senator sees. The fairest way to read these results is that they’re about the same across the board. There’s no obvious advantage seen by Trump at all.

There was another poll this month that gives the lie to Trump’s reply to Scarborough. Siena College surveyed New York state, seeing how home-field favorites Trump, Clinton and Sanders would fare. In New York, unsurprisingly, the Republicans all did much worse than the Democrats.


The reason we generally dismiss head-to-head polls at this point is that the campaign has barely started, and the general election hasn't started at all. A lot shifts and changes over the months that the nominees compete, and history tells us that trying to predict a winner from polls like these is a fool’s errand. It’s possible that Trump would solidify support from a lot of Democrats and independents if he got the nomination, but there’s no evidence yet that he will — or that he’d do so more effectively than would one of the other Republicans.

Not that we expect that this will cause him to reconsider his argument.

Source : The Washington Post

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Nigerian army Claims the Second Rescue of Chibok Girl

A second schoolgirl that was seized in the Nigerian town of Chibok has been found, the army says. But a spokesman for the Chibok girls' parents has cast doubt on the claims, saying that the girl's name is not on the families' list of those missing. An army spokesman said Serah Luka was among a group of 97 women and children rescued by troops in the north-east. Islamist militant group Boko Haram has abducted thousands of other girls in recent years, rights groups estimate. This comes two days after the rescue of the first Chibok girl, Amina Ali Nkeki. The army has previously given misleading statements about the rescue of the Chibok girls - in its initial statement after Ms Nkeki was found, it used a wrong name. In all, 218 girls remain missing after their abduction by the Boko Haram Islamist group from Chibok secondary school in north-eastern Nigeria in 2014. Ms Nkeki told a Chibok community leader that six of the kidnapped girls had died, but...

Obama administration Issues Transgender Access to School Bathrooms

The issue of directing public schools to allow transgender students to use bathrooms matching their gender identity is being discussed by the Obama administration on Friday. A joint letter from the Departments of Education and Justice will go out to schools on Friday with guidelines to ensure that "transgender students enjoy a supportive and nondiscriminatory school environment," the Obama administration said on Thursday. The announcement comes amid heated debate over transgender rights in schools and public life, which includes a legal standoff between the administration and North Carolina over its controversial House Bill 2. The guidance goes beyond the bathroom issue, touching upon privacy rights, education records and sex-segregated athletics, all but guaranteeing transgender students the right to identify in school as they choose. "There is no room in our schools for discrimination of any kind, including discrimination against transgender students on ...

Will Ferrell and His Bird Collectian As "The Birds are for God"

An acclaimed actor and comedic genius like Will Ferrell is incredibly pleased to spend some valued time with his incredibly expensive bird collection, according to his good friend Adam McKay. McKay, who has directed Ferrell in films like "Anchorman" and "Step Brothers," told HuffPost Live on Monday that Ferrell's home is brimming with birds of all kinds, and Ferrell himself is a bit of a bird whisperer. "He has giant cages on his property filled with different tropical birds, and these are the kind of birds that will bite you, that you have to be careful with, but when it's him, they just fly right to his arm," McKay said. "Often times if you're at his house ... he has, like, a cockatiel on his shoulder for long stretches." An affinity for birds isn't exactly surprising, but what will shock you is the enormous monetary value of Ferrell's flock. "He had to have his bird collection insured, and I think it's wor...